Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro FX 360M

Place in the ranking	1425	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.88
Power efficiency	0.94	13.85
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G86	TU102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	9 May 2007 (18 years ago)	13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	4608
Core clock speed	400 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.200	509.8
Floating-point processing power	0.0256 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	8	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	48 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	9.6 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	1.1	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 360M 0.21

RTX 8000 47.25
+22400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 360M 86

RTX 8000 19798
+22921%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
God of War	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −21567%	650−700 +21567%
God of War	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −22043%	1550−1600 +22043%
Valorant	24−27 −22300%	5600−5650 +22300%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 −22400%	2700−2750 +22400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	9−10 −22122%	2000−2050 +22122%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −21567%	650−700 +21567%
God of War	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −22043%	1550−1600 +22043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Valorant	24−27 −22300%	5600−5650 +22300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	9−10 −22122%	2000−2050 +22122%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −21567%	650−700 +21567%
God of War	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −22043%	1550−1600 +22043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Valorant	24−27 −22300%	5600−5650 +22300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −22400%	450−500 +22400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −22400%	450−500 +22400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

1−2

−21900%

220−230
+21900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −22233%	3350−3400 +22233%
Valorant	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−21900%

220−230
+21900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

−22400%

450−500
+22400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.21	47.25
Recency	9 May 2007	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	48 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	260 Watt

FX 360M has 1429.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 22400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 360M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 360M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro FX 360M

Quadro RTX 8000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Mobility FireGL V5700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104

GeForce 8600M GS

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150

Radeon HD 4330

ATI Radeon HD 4670

GeForce 8400M GT

AMD Radeon R7 M270DX

GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh

Radeon HD 3470

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Radeon HD 2300

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Radeon 9700

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q

FX Go 5200

ATI Radeon 9250

Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.6 469 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 360M or Quadro RTX 8000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.