GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro FX 360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 360M with GeForce 9300M GS, including specs and performance data.

FX 360M
2007
256 MB DDR2, 17 Watt
0.21

9300M GS outperforms 360M by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14381393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.951.66
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG86G98
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168
Core clock speed400 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors210 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2004.400
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data34
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache16 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-I

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 360M 0.21
9300M GS 0.28
+33.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 360M 86
Samples: 45
9300M GS 118
+37.2%
Samples: 497

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the 9300M GS is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9300M GS performs better in 6 tests (20%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (80%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.28
Recency 9 May 2007 4 June 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 13 Watt

9300M GS has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 23.1% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9300M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 360M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 360M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300M GS is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Quadro FX 360M
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 165 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 360M or GeForce 9300M GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.