Arc A770M vs Quadro FX 360M

Place in the ranking	1368	186
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.90	17.50
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	G86	DG2-512
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	4096
Core clock speed	400 MHz	1650 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.200	524.8
Floating-point processing power	0.0256 TFLOPS	16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	128
TMUs	8	256
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	9.6 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 360M 0.22

Arc A770M 30.12
+13591%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 360M 86

Arc A770M 11618
+13409%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	97
1440p	-0−1	57
4K	-0−1	39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−5550%

113
+5550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4650%	95 +4650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1975%	160−170 +1975%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3575%	140−150 +3575%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3750%	77 +3750%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1975%	160−170 +1975%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −5175%	211 +5175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −822%	80−85 +822%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3250%	67 +3250%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1213%	105 +1213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4375%	179 +4375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −467%	51 +467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −364%	130−140 +364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	44
Hitman 3	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −4000%	82 +4000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3350%

65−70
+3350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	24−27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1700%

35−40
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

+0%

90−95

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Hitman 3	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 +0%	62 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 +0%	22 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 +0%	74 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc A770M is 5550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A770M is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.22	30.12
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	120 Watt

FX 360M has 605.9% lower power consumption.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 13590.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 360M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 360M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A770M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.