Arc A770M vs Quadro FX 360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.31
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG86DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed400 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200524.8
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 360M 86
Arc A770M 11577
+13362%

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 120 Watt

FX 360M has 605.9% lower power consumption.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 360M and Arc A770M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 360M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A770M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Quadro FX 360M
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 89 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.