GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs Quadro FX 350M

Place in the ranking	1450	146
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.53	30.44
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G72	TU104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 March 2006 (18 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	2560
Core clock speed	450 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	112 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.800	184.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	64
TMUs	4	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	450 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	352.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 350M 0.11

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 34.00
+30809%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350M 44

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13624
+30864%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	104
1440p	-0−1	70
4K	-0−1	49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −700%	70−75 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −700%	70−75 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1600%	34 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3260%	160−170 +3260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2625%	109 +2625%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −700%	70−75 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1367%	88 +1367%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3260%	160−170 +3260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −3740%	190−200 +3740%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1175%	51 +1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2975%	120−130 +2975%
World of Tanks	10−11 −2680%	270−280 +2680%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −700%	70−75 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1450%	90−95 +1450%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −3260%	160−170 +3260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −3740%	190−200 +3740%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−17400%

170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2725%	110−120 +2725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1375%	55−60 +1375%
Valorant	4−5 −2400%	100 +2400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −387%	73 +387%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −387%	73 +387%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −387%	73 +387%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	42
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Dota 2	14−16 −587%	103 +587%
Valorant	0−1	51

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	89 +0%	89 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%
Valorant	157 +0%	157 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Dota 2	128 +0%	128 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 +0%	125 +0%
Metro Exodus	80 +0%	80 +0%
Valorant	94 +0%	94 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Dota 2	127 +0%	127 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Valorant	136 +0%	136 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +0%	33 +0%
World of Tanks	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	76 +0%	76 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	75 +0%	75 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	28 +0%	28 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21 +0%	21 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
there's a draw in 31 test (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.11	34.00
Recency	13 March 2006	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt

FX 350M has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 30809.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.