GeForce FX 5700 vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 350M with GeForce FX 5700, including specs and performance data.

FX 350M
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.11
+10%

350M outperforms FX 5700 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15061512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.560.31
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG72NV36
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 March 2006 (19 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speed450 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.8001.700
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 350M 0.11
+10%
FX 5700 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350M 44
+10%
Samples: 21
FX 5700 40
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.10
Recency 13 March 2006 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

FX 350M has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 350M and GeForce FX 5700.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.