Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3500M with Radeon RX 7900 XTX, including specs and performance data.

FX 3500M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.73

RX 7900 XTX outperforms FX 3500M by a whopping 10122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120115
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1142.79
Power efficiency1.2416.02
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG71Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7900 XTX has 38800% better value for money than FX 3500M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores326144
Core clock speed575 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz2498 MHz
Number of transistors278 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate13.80959.2
Floating-point processing powerno data61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs24384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3500M 0.73
RX 7900 XTX 74.62
+10122%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3500M Samples: 3 306
RX 7900 XTX Samples: 8394 31268
+10118%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−11900%
240
+11900%
1440p1−2
−15800%
159
+15800%
4K0−1100

Cost per frame, $

1080p50.00
−1101%
4.16
+1101%
1440p99.99
−1491%
6.28
+1491%
4Kno data9.99
  • RX 7900 XTX has 1101% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX has 1491% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12400%
250
+12400%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−3533%
218
+3533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11900%
240
+11900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−21100%
212
+21100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6660%
338
+6660%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−3000%
186
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
Valorant 27−30
−1490%
450−500
+1490%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1224%
270−280
+1224%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10750%
217
+10750%
Dota 2 12−14
−1415%
197
+1415%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−20400%
205
+20400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6500%
330
+6500%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2617%
163
+2617%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−23800%
239
+23800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8983%
545
+8983%
Valorant 27−30
−1490%
450−500
+1490%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10250%
207
+10250%
Dota 2 12−14
−1269%
178
+1269%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−18800%
189
+18800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−5800%
295
+5800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2500%
156
+2500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4867%
298
+4867%
Valorant 27−30
−1490%
450−500
+1490%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−8800%
267
+8800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−17100%
500−550
+17100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 146
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−14400%
290
+14400%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−12700%
128
+12700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−23700%
238
+23700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1140%
186
+1140%
Valorant 4−5
−8150%
300−350
+8150%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 355
+0%
355
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 348
+0%
348
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 269
+0%
269
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 339
+0%
339
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 254
+0%
254
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 175
+0%
175
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 165
+0%
165
+0%
Metro Exodus 161
+0%
161
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 108
+0%
108
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197
+0%
197
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+0%
227
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 69
+0%
69
+0%

This is how FX 3500M and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is 11900% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 15800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 23800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX performs better in 37 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 74.62
Recency 1 March 2007 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 355 Watt

FX 3500M has 688.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 10121.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Quadro FX 3500M
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4792 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500M or Radeon RX 7900 XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.