ION 2 vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3500M with ION 2, including specs and performance data.


FX 3500M
2007, $100
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.73
+143%

3500M outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12241391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency1.251.16
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG71GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2007 (19 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed575 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate13.804.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03424 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

1440p
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the FX 3500M is 167% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FX 3500M performs better in 23 tests (88%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.30
Recency 1 March 2007 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 20 Watt

FX 3500M has a 143% higher aggregate performance score.

ION 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

The Quadro FX 3500M is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while ION 2 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 27 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500M or ION 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.