CMP 30HX vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX 3500M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.79

CMP 30HX outperforms Quadro FX 3500M by a whopping 2566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1110242
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2007)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameG71GLMTU116
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (17 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 $799
Current price$69 (0.7x MSRP)$24 (0x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321408
Core clock speed8 MHzno data
Boost clock speed575 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors278 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate13.80157.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 3500M and CMP 30HX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3500M 0.79
CMP 30HX 21.06
+2566%

CMP 30HX outperforms Quadro FX 3500M by 2566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 3500M 306
CMP 30HX 8135
+2558%

CMP 30HX outperforms Quadro FX 3500M by 2558% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2400%
300−310
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2400%
300−310
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2400%
300−310
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 21.06
Recency 1 March 2007 25 February 2021
Cost $99.99 $799
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation card while CMP 30HX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Quadro FX 3500M
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 25 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.