FireStream 9250 vs Quadro FX 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3500 and FireStream 9250, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


FX 3500
2006, $1,599
256 MB GDDR3, 80 Watt
0.63

FireStream 9250 outperforms FX 3500 by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1255847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.611.43
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG71RV770
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 May 2006 (19 years ago)16 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed450 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors278 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate9.00025.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2040
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length173 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3500 0.63
FireStream 9250 2.78
+341%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3500 265
Samples: 211
FireStream 9250 1164
+339%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 2.78
Recency 22 May 2006 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

FX 3500 has 88% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9250, on the other hand, has a 341% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

The FireStream 9250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3500 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500 or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.