CMP 40HX vs Quadro FX 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 350 and CMP 40HX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


FX 350
2006
128 MB DDR2, 21 Watt
0.20

CMP 40HX outperforms FX 350 by a whopping 11240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1450278
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.37
Power efficiency0.739.44
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG72TU106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed550 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors112 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200237.6
Floating-point processing powerno data7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length168 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 350 0.20
CMP 40HX 22.68
+11240%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350 85
Samples: 2
CMP 40HX 9343
+10892%
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 22.68
Recency 20 April 2006 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 185 Watt

FX 350 has 781% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has a 11240% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 40HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 350 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 75 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350 or CMP 40HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.