ATI Radeon X1050 vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3000 with Radeon X1050, including specs and performance data.

FX 3000
2003, $203
256 MB DDR
0.16
+33.3%

FX 3000 outperforms X1050 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14791508
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.39
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameNV35RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2003 (22 years ago)7 December 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors135 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data24 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001.600
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3000 0.16
+33.3%
ATI X1050 0.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3000 69
+40.8%
Samples: 14
ATI X1050 49
Samples: 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.12
Recency 22 July 2003 7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 110 nm

FX 3000 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI X1050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro FX 3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1050 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1050 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Quadro FX 3000
ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or Radeon X1050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.