ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3000 with Radeon HD 5470, including specs and performance data.

FX 3000
2003, $203
256 MB DDR
0.16

HD 5470 outperforms FX 3000 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14791252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.59
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNV35Cedar
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2003 (22 years ago)13 February 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed400 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors135 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data19 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2005.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.104 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3000 0.16
ATI HD 5470 0.64
+300%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3000 69
Samples: 14
ATI HD 5470 268
+288%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.64
Recency 22 July 2003 13 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm

ATI HD 5470 has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 5470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 5470 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or Radeon HD 5470, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.