Tesla T10 Processor vs Quadro FX 2800M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1084not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.00no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG92GT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 December 2009 (14 years ago)9 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240
Core clock speed600 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8048.80
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 188 Watt

FX 2800M has an age advantage of 7 months, and 150.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla T10 Processor, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2800M and Tesla T10 Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation card while Tesla T10 Processor is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Quadro FX 2800M
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Tesla T10 Processor

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 17 votes

Rate Tesla T10 Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.