Tesla T10 Processor vs Quadro FX 2500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1289not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG71GT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32240
Core clock speed500 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0048.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2480
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2005 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 188 Watt

FX 2500M has 317.8% lower power consumption.

Tesla T10 Processor, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2500M and Tesla T10 Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla T10 Processor is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX 2500M
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Tesla T10 Processor

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 17 votes

Rate Tesla T10 Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2500M or Tesla T10 Processor, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.