ATI Radeon 9600 XT vs Quadro FX 2700M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 2700M with Radeon 9600 XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 2700M
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.91
+911%

FX 2700M outperforms ATI 9600 XT by a whopping 911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11291463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.010.29
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG94RV360
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed530 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors505 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate12.722.000
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed799 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 2700M 0.91
+911%
ATI 9600 XT 0.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 2700M 366
+946%
ATI 9600 XT 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
World of Tanks 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 4−5 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.09
Recency 14 August 2008 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 22 Watt

FX 2700M has a 911.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 XT, on the other hand, has 195.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro FX 2700M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2700M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 9600 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Quadro FX 2700M
ATI Radeon 9600 XT
Radeon 9600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 36 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2700M or Radeon 9600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.