UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro FX 2500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 2500M with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

FX 2500M
2005
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.49

Graphics 770 outperforms 2500M by a whopping 996% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1273636
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8828.84
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG71Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0026.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 2500M 0.49
UHD Graphics 770 5.37
+996%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 2500M 217
Samples: 24
UHD Graphics 770 790
+264%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
4K1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p99.99no data
4K99.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
11
+120%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 17
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Valorant 27−30
−139%
65−70
+139%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−465%
95−100
+465%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 10−12
−291%
43
+291%
Far Cry 5 0−1 16
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Metro Exodus 0−1 5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Valorant 27−30
−139%
65−70
+139%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 10−12
−264%
40
+264%
Far Cry 5 0−1 14
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Valorant 27−30
−139%
65−70
+139%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−2100%
40−45
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 10−12

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how FX 2500M and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 1700% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 1200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 performs better in 31 tests (54%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 5.37
Recency 29 September 2005 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 995.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX 2500M
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1408 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2500M or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.