RTX A500 vs Quadro FX 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 2000 and RTX A500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 2000
2003
128 MB DDR2
0.04

RTX A500 outperforms FX 2000 by a whopping 39300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1547372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.18
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV30GA107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 January 2003 (22 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed400 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors125 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200113.3
Floating-point processing powerno data7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 2000 0.04
RTX A500 15.76
+39300%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 2000 18
Samples: 1
RTX A500 6590
+36511%
Samples: 748

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 15.76
Recency 21 January 2003 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

RTX A500 has a 39300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000
Quadro FX 2000
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 169 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2000 or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.