GeForce GT 610 vs Quadro FX 1800M

Place in the ranking	1056	1147
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	1.86	1.95
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GT215	GF119
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	15 June 2009 (15 years ago)	2 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$39.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	72	48
Core clock speed	561 MHz	810 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	102 °C
Texture fill rate	13.46	6.480
Floating-point processing power	0.162 TFLOPS	0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	24	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1024 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	550 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	35.2 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.2
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1800M 1.17
+48.1%

GT 610 0.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1800M 466
+47.5%

GT 610 316

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Fortnite	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
World of Tanks	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Valorant	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Dota 2	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2	0−1