Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro FX 1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro FX 1000 Quadro FX 1100 Quadro FX 1300 Quadro FX 1400 Quadro FX 1500 Quadro FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition Quadro FX 1800
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1800 with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 1800
2009
768 MB GDDR3, 59 Watt
1.03

RX 6750 XT outperforms FX 1800 by a whopping 5151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 1800 FX 1800
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0351.91
Power efficiency1.2014.89
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG94Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$489 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 172933% better value for money than FX 1800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642560
Core clock speed550 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors505 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60416.0
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1264
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1800 1.03
RX 6750 XT 54.09
+5151%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1800 397
RX 6750 XT 20786
+5136%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5400%
165
+5400%
1440p1−2
−8600%
87
+8600%
4K0−151

Cost per frame, $

1080p163.00
−4799%
3.33
+4799%
1440p489.00
−7649%
6.31
+7649%
4Kno data10.76
  • RX 6750 XT has 4799% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT has 7649% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 368
+0%
368
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 142
+0%
142
+0%
Metro Exodus 150
+0%
150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+0%
304
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260
+0%
260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+0%
186
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how FX 1800 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 5400% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 8600% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.03 54.09
Recency 30 March 2009 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 250 Watt

FX 1800 has 323.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 5151.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Quadro FX 1800
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
vs
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
vs
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
PCX 5900 GeForce PCX 5900
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
FX 3500 Quadro FX 3500
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FirePro S9170 FirePro S9170
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
Tesla T10 Processor Tesla T10 Processor
vs
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
Quadro K620M Quadro K620M
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
NVS 440 Quadro NVS 440
vs
ATI 9600 PRO Radeon 9600 PRO
FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800
vs
RX Vega XL Radeon RX Vega XL
FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 133 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2677 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.