RTX A2000 vs Quadro FX 1800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX 1800
2009
768 MB GDDR3
1.04

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro FX 1800 by 3319% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1058133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.0518.72
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameG94GA106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$489 $449
Current price$132 (0.3x MSRP)$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 37340% better value for money than FX 1800.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores643328
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors505 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60124.8
Floating-point performance176 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1800 1.04
RTX A2000 35.56
+3319%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro FX 1800 by 3319% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 1800 403
RTX A2000 13762
+3315%

RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro FX 1800 by 3315% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.04 35.56
Recency 30 March 2009 10 August 2021
Cost $489 $449
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Quadro FX 1800
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 114 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 501 vote

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.