Quadro 600 vs FX 1800

Place in performance ranking	1058	960
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.05	0.11
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	G94	GF108
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)	13 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$489	$179
Current price	$132 (0.3x MSRP)	$118 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 600 has 120% better value for money than FX 1800.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	96
Core clock speed	550 MHz	640 MHz
Number of transistors	505 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	59 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.60	10.24
Floating-point performance	176 gflops	245.76 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	198 mm	168 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB	1 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	25.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.1	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1800 1.04

Quadro 600 1.38
+32.7%

600 outperforms FX 1800 by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 1800 403

Quadro 600 535
+32.8%

600 outperforms FX 1800 by 33% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.04	1.38
Recency	30 March 2009	13 December 2010
Cost	$489	$179
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	59 Watt	40 Watt