GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro FX 1800

Place in the ranking	1106	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	48.90
Power efficiency	1.20	19.94
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G94	AD103
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$489	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 162900% better value for money than FX 1800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	8448
Core clock speed	550 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	505 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	59 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.60	689.0
Floating-point processing power	0.176 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	12	96
TMUs	32	264
Tensor Cores	no data	264
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	198 mm	310 mm
Width	1-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1800 0.99

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 79.40
+7920%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1800 397

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31732
+7893%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −11200%	226 +11200%
1440p	1−2 −15800%	159 +15800%
4K	1−2 −9400%	95 +9400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	244.50 −6816%	3.54 +6816%
1440p	489.00 −9631%	5.03 +9631%
4K	489.00 −5714%	8.41 +5714%

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 6816% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 9631% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 5714% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

189

+0%

189

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	189 +0%	189 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	467 +0%	467 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	171 +0%	171 +0%
Dota 2	174 +0%	174 +0%
Far Cry 5	150 +0%	150 +0%
Fortnite	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	442 +0%	442 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	174 +0%	174 +0%
Metro Exodus	79 +0%	79 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150 +0%	150 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	407 +0%	407 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	155 +0%	155 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	155 +0%	155 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	306 +0%	306 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	159 +0%	159 +0%
Valorant	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	72 +0%	72 +0%
Dota 2	182 +0%	182 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	182 +0%	182 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	182 +0%	182 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	22 +0%	22 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +0%	162 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

This is how FX 1800 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 11200% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 15800% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 9400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.99	79.40
Recency	30 March 2009	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	59 Watt	285 Watt

FX 1800 has 383.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 7920.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2033.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.