Tesla M6 vs Quadro FX 1600M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data8.27
ArchitectureG8x (2007−2008)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameNB8P-GLMGM204
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2007 (16 years ago)30 August 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.90 no data
Current price$212 (1.4x MSRP)$350

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321536
Core clock speed625 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1180 MHz
Number of transistors289 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00113.3
Floating-point performance80 gflops3,625 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 1600M and Tesla M6 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.15.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 1600M 131
Tesla M6 6284
+4697%

Tesla M6 outperforms Quadro FX 1600M by 4697% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 June 2007 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1600M and Tesla M6. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1600M is a mobile workstation card while Tesla M6 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 28 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.