ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 vs Quadro FX 1600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1294not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.47no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG84M54
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2007 (17 years ago)19 January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.90 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores326
Core clock speed625 MHz445 MHz
Boost clock speedno data445 MHz
Number of transistors289 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.001.780
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2007 19 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm

FX 1600M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1600M and Mobility Radeon X1400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1600M is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon X1400 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Quadro FX 1600M
ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
Mobility Radeon X1400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 29 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.