ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs Quadro FX 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1300 with Radeon 9800 PRO, including specs and performance data.

FX 1300
2004
128 MB DDR, 55 Watt
0.09

ATI 9800 PRO outperforms FX 1300 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14591417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.110.22
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV38R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 1300 and ATI 9800 PRO have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed350 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors135 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8003.040
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0 (9_0)
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1300 0.09
ATI 9800 PRO 0.15
+66.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1300 34
ATI 9800 PRO 59
+73.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.09 0.15
Recency 9 August 2004 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 47 Watt

FX 1300 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 17% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 9800 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.