T400 vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro 7000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
9.07

T400 outperforms Quadro 7000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking450439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9416.46
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGF110TU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 May 2012 (12 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data
Current price$965 (0.1x MSRP)$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T400 has 1651% better value for money than Quadro 7000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed651 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6634.20
Floating-point performance1,332 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3404 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 7000 9.07
T400 9.39
+3.5%

T400 outperforms Quadro 7000 by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 7000 3505
T400 3630
+3.6%

T400 outperforms Quadro 7000 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.07 9.39
Recency 2 May 2012 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 30 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 7000 and T400.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while T400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 366 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.