ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 7000 with Radeon HD 3850 AGP, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 7000
2012, $14,499
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
8.38
+714%

7000 outperforms HD 3850 AGP by a whopping 714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5461148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.161.06
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF110RV670
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 May 2012 (13 years ago)3 January 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512320
Core clock speed651 MHz668 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6610.69
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS0.4275 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6416
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz828 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s52.99 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 7000 8.38
+714%
ATI HD 3850 AGP 1.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 7000 3505
+711%
Samples: 2
ATI HD 3850 AGP 432
Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 1.03
Recency 2 May 2012 3 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro 7000 has a 713.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 3850 AGP, on the other hand, has 172% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3850 AGP in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 3850 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Radeon HD 3850 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 36 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or Radeon HD 3850 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.