ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4830 4850 4850 Mac Edition 4850 X2 4860 4870 4870 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 7000 with Mobility Radeon HD 4870, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 7000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
8.36
+322%

7000 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4870 by a whopping 322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
ATI Mobility HD 4870 Mobility HD 4870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking527913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.13no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF110M98
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 May 2012 (13 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512800
Core clock speed651 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Wattno data
Texture fill rate41.6622.00
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz888 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s56.83 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+293%
28
−293%

Cost per frame, $

1080p131.81no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro 7000 and ATI Mobility HD 4870 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 7000 is 293% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.36 1.98
Recency 2 May 2012 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm

Quadro 7000 has a 322.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro 7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
GRID K520 GRID K520
ATI Mobility HD 4870 Mobility Radeon HD 4870
vs
GeForce 920A GeForce 920A
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
FX 1500 FX 1500
vs
K2000D K2000D
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
vs
K2000D K2000D
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
vs
Quadro K4000 K4000
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
vs
Quadro K600 K600
R9 360 OEM R9 360 OEM
vs
NVS 510 NVS 510
Arc 130V Mobile Arc 130V Mobile
vs
Quadro 2000D 2000D
RTX 5060 RTX 5060
vs
Tesla C2090 Tesla C2090
RX 580G RX 580G
vs
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
vs
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
R7 435 OEM R7 435 OEM
vs
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or Mobility Radeon HD 4870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.