Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 2000 2000D 4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2070 Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 600 with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 600
2010, $179
1 GB DDR3, 40 Watt
1.24

6750 XT outperforms 600 by a whopping 3869% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107770
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0650.03
Power efficiency2.3915.18
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 December 2010 (14 years ago)3 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6750 XT has 83283% better value for money than Quadro 600.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed640 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate10.24416.0
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 600 1.24
RX 6750 XT 49.22
+3869%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 600 521
Samples: 1906
RX 6750 XT 20683
+3870%
Samples: 4805

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−3975%
163
+3975%
1440p2−3
−4300%
88
+4300%
4K1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p44.75
−1229%
3.37
+1229%
1440p89.50
−1335%
6.24
+1335%
4K179.00
−1530%
10.98
+1530%
  • RX 6750 XT has 1229% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT has 1335% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT has 1530% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+0%
127
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+0%
217
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Dota 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
+0%
245
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how Quadro 600 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 3975% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 4300% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 4900% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 49.22
Recency 13 December 2010 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro 600 has 525% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 3869.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GTX 260 OEM GTX 260 OEM
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Rev. 2
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
UHD Graphics 910 Graphics 910
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RX 6700 RX 6700
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
K4100M Quadro K4100M
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GeForce2 MX DH Pro TV PCI MX DH Pro TV PCI
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
RX 560 XT RX 560 XT
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU Max 32-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 457 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3158 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 600 or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.