GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 400 Quadro 410 Quadro 600
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 RTX 3060 Ti RTX 3070 RTX 3070 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 600 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 600
2010
1 GB DDR3, 40 Watt
1.37

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms 600 by a whopping 4361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101532
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1552.67
Power efficiency2.3514.44
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 December 2010 (14 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 Ti has 35013% better value for money than Quadro 600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores966144
Core clock speed640 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate10.24339.8
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 600 1.37
RTX 3070 Ti 61.12
+4361%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 600 529
RTX 3070 Ti 23555
+4353%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−4450%
182
+4450%
1440p2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
4K1−2
−6200%
63
+6200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p44.753.29
1440p89.506.05
4K179.009.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 174
+0%
174
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 171
+0%
171
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 316
+0%
316
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 103
+0%
103
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 243
+0%
243
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 274
+0%
274
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 108
+0%
108
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 93
+0%
93
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 184
+0%
184
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
+0%
205
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+0%
58
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+0%
119
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
+0%
46
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

This is how Quadro 600 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 4450% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 4850% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 6200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.37 61.12
Recency 13 December 2010 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 290 Watt

Quadro 600 has 625% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 4361.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 410 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6092 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.