NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs M600M
Comparison of Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
21.6 GTexel / s
14.02 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
83.2 GB / s
80 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro 5010M 6.54
Quadro M600M 7.51 +14.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro 5010M 2693
Quadro M600M 2911 +8.1%
3DMark Vantage Performance
Quadro 5010M 12991 +2%
Quadro M600M 12734
Quadro 5010M 1833
Quadro M600M 1932 +5.4%
Let's see how good Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (83.2 vs 80 GB/s)
FP64 IEEE 754
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M600M
14.8% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 22 February 2011)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (30 vs 100 watts)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, Quadro 5010M or M600M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M600M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro 5010M and Quadro M600M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.