Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Quadro 500M

Place in the ranking	980	140
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.94	9.88
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GF108	Vega 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	4096
Core clock speed	700 MHz	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1468 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.20	375.8
Floating-point processing power	0.2688 TFLOPS	12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	16	256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.125
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 500M 1.48

Pro Vega 64X 35.53
+2301%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 500M 570

Pro Vega 64X 13708
+2305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.48	35.53
Recency	22 February 2011	19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	250 Watt

Quadro 500M has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has a 2300.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 500M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.