Radeon HD 8650M vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000 with Radeon HD 8650M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000
2011, $2,499
2.5 GB GDDR5, 152 Watt
4.70
+153%

5000 outperforms HD 8650M by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
HD 8650M HD 8650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking692957
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency2.38no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameGF100no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 February 2011 (15 years ago)7 January 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352384
Core clock speed513 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million900 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.57no data
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs44no data
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.70 1.86
Recency 23 February 2011 7 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

Quadro 5000 has a 153% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 8650M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8650M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
HD 8650M Radeon HD 8650M
vs
HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
4000 Mac Edition NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega 64 Nano
4000 Mac Edition NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
vs
RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile
Quadro 400 NVIDIA Quadro 400
vs
HD 8330 HD 8330
Quadro 400 NVIDIA Quadro 400
vs
HD 8570 OEM HD 8570 OEM
Quadro 5000 NVIDIA Quadro 5000
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
Quadro 5000 NVIDIA Quadro 5000
vs
GTX 555 OEM GTX 555 OEM
Quadro 5000 NVIDIA Quadro 5000
vs
GeForce 720M GeForce 720M
Quadro 5000 NVIDIA Quadro 5000
vs
7900 GT GeForce 7900 GT
Quadro 5000 NVIDIA Quadro 5000
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Quadro 5000 NVIDIA Quadro 5000
vs
RX Vega Nano RX Vega Nano

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 34 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or Radeon HD 8650M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.