P106-100 vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000 and P106-100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro 5000
2011
2.5 GB GDDR5, 152 Watt
4.68

P106-100 outperforms 5000 by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking672352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency2.3510.16
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF100GP106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 February 2011 (14 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3521280
Core clock speed513 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate22.57136.7
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs4048
TMUs4480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length248 mm250 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB6 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.06.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000 4.68
P106-100 15.99
+242%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000 1962
P106-100 6699
+241%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 5000 7315
P106-100 36117
+394%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.68 15.99
Recency 23 February 2011 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 120 Watt

P106-100 has a 241.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 34 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 291 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.