GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro 5000

Place in performance ranking	596	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	80
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.27	18.34
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GF100	N18P-G62
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 February 2011 (13 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data
Current price	$991 (0.4x MSRP)	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 6693% better value for money than Quadro 5000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	352	1024
Core clock speed	513 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	152 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	22.57	95.04
Floating-point performance	722.3 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 5000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2.5 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	120.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	2.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000 5.00

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+304%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro 5000 by 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 5000 1933

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+303%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro 5000 by 303% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −314%	58 +314%
1440p	10−12 −370%	47 +370%
4K	5−6 −360%	23 +360%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−321%

59
+321%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −336%	61 +336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −308%	49 +308%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −342%	53 +342%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −331%	69 +331%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −367%	84 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Hitman 3	12−14 −325%	51 +325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −326%	115 +326%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −333%	91 +333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −340%	44 +340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −352%	95 +352%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −329%	60 +329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −357%	32 +357%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −370%	47 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −350%	36 +350%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −314%	58 +314%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Hitman 3	10−11 −350%	45 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −350%	180 +350%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −325%	68 +325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −320%	42 +320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −317%	75 +317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −350%	72 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −307%	183 +307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −350%	27 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −400%	15 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −343%	31 +343%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −325%	34 +325%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −333%	39 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −357%	64 +357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −350%	63 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −333%	39 +333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −340%	22 +340%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−310%

41
+310%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −333%	35−40 +333%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −333%	35−40 +333%
Hitman 3	6−7 −367%	28 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −310%	40−45 +310%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −322%	35−40 +322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −320%	40−45 +320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−313%

30−35

+313%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
Hitman 3	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −317%	25 +317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−350%

18−20

+350%

This is how Quadro 5000 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 314% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 370% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 360% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.00	20.19
Recency	23 February 2011	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2.5 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	152 Watt	50 Watt