GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i vs Quadro 5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking670not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.34no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF100C79
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 February 2011 (14 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35216
Core clock speed513 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate22.573.600
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2011 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro 5000 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9300 + nForce 730i, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 and GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 34 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.