ATI Radeon 9100 vs Quadro 410

Place in the ranking	1145	1574
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	no data
Power efficiency	2.11	0.03
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GK107	R200
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	7 August 2012 (13 years ago)	1 April 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	706 MHz	250 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	60 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.30	2.000
Floating-point processing power	0.2711 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	16	8
L1 Cache	16 KB	no data
L2 Cache	128 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	176 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	64 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	891 MHz	250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.26 GB/s	8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	8.1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 410 1.04
+10300%

ATI 9100 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 410 434
+8580%

Samples: 127

ATI 9100 5
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.04	0.01
Recency	7 August 2012	1 April 2003
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	64 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	28 Watt

Quadro 410 has a 10300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9100, on the other hand, has 36% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9100 is a desktop one.