GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Quadro 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 4GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 A Mobile 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Mobile 3060 Max-Q 3060 Mobile 3070 Max-Q 3070 Mobile 3070 Ti Max-Q 3070 Ti Mobile 3080 Max-Q 3080 Mobile 3080 Ti Max-Q 3080 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 410 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 410
2012, $149
512 MB DDR3, 38 Watt
1.02

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 410 by a whopping 4032% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1144100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.0628.18
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK107GA104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925632
Core clock speed706 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate11.30248.2
Floating-point processing power0.2711 TFLOPS15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16176
Tensor Coresno data176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44
L1 Cache16 KB5.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length176 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.26 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 410 1.02
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 42.15
+4032%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 410 426
Samples: 120
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17637
+4040%
Samples: 3737

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
1440p1−2
−7100%
72
+7100%
4K1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p74.50no data
1440p149.00no data
4K149.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 89
+0%
89
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Quadro 410 and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 5800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 7100% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 4600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.02 42.15
Recency 7 August 2012 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro 410 has 202.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4032.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 410
Quadro 410
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
Tesla K20X Tesla K20X
vs
ATI 9600 Radeon 9600
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
256 SDR GeForce 256 SDR
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
MX450 25W GeForce MX450 25W
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
Pro 570X Pro 570X
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
P104-100 P104 100
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
RTX 3080 RTX 3080
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
GT 330M GT 330M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1048 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 410 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.