GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Quadro 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K120Q GRID K140Q GRID K180Q GRID K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 410 with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 410
2012
512 MB DDR3, 38 Watt
1.13

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms 410 by a whopping 2594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1068179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.0618.33
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107TU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921920
Core clock speed706 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate11.30144.0
Floating-point processing power0.2711 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs16120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length176 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.26 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3267%
101
+3267%
1440p2−3
−2900%
60
+2900%
4K1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.67no data
1440p74.50no data
4K149.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 91
+0%
91
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 366
+0%
366
+0%
Hitman 3 83
+0%
83
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 223
+0%
223
+0%
Metro Exodus 130
+0%
130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+0%
148
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+0%
227
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 107
+0%
107
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280
+0%
280
+0%
Hitman 3 75
+0%
75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 196
+0%
196
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+0%
123
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190
+0%
190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+0%
88
+0%
Hitman 3 66
+0%
66
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 94
+0%
94
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+0%
38
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 246
+0%
246
+0%
Hitman 3 46
+0%
46
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210
+0%
210
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30
+0%
30
+0%
Hitman 3 28
+0%
28
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+0%
25
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+0%
22
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
+0%
20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how Quadro 410 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 3267% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 2900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 4200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.13 30.44
Recency 7 August 2012 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro 410 has 202.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2593.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 410
Quadro 410
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
Graphics 512SP Mobile Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
vs
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5500
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
RX 580 Mobile Radeon RX 580 Mobile
vs
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU UHD Graphics 16EU
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
GT 140 OEM GeForce GT 140 OEM
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
ATI 9200 Radeon 9200
vs
7200 GS GeForce 7200 GS
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
ATI RS250 RS250
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
Stoney Stoney
FX 5200 Rev. 2 GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 13 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1639 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.