RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Quadro 4000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 4000M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.20

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms 4000M by a whopping 1260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3991.25
Power efficiency2.2643.94
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF104AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 23297% better value for money than Quadro 4000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3362816
Core clock speed475 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate26.60187.4
Floating-point processing power0.6384 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs5688
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 4000M 3.20
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 43.51
+1260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000M 1278
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17396
+1261%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 4000M 5212
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 84750
+1526%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
−1238%
950−1000
+1238%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.32
−826%
0.68
+826%
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 826% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Fortnite 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Valorant 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−1193%
750−800
+1193%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Dota 2 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Fortnite 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Valorant 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Dota 2 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Valorant 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Valorant 30−35
−1190%
400−450
+1190%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1213%
210−220
+1213%
Valorant 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

This is how Quadro 4000M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1238% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.20 43.51
Recency 22 February 2011 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 1259.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 40 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.