Quadro T1000 vs 4000M

Place in performance ranking	701	302
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.98	8.74
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Fermi	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data
Current price	$118 (0.3x MSRP)	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 792% better value for money than Quadro 4000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	no data
Core clock speed	475 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.60	no data
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 4000M and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 4000M 3.37

Quadro T1000 16.91
+402%

T1000 outperforms 4000M by 402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 4000M 1302

Quadro T1000 6531
+402%

T1000 outperforms 4000M by 402% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro 4000M 5141

Quadro T1000 33852
+558%

T1000 outperforms 4000M by 558% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−393%

350−400
+393%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
−400%

30−33

+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −400%	75−80 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −400%	90−95 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −400%	75−80 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −400%	90−95 +400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −400%	75−80 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −400%	90−95 +400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−400%

45−50

+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Hitman 3	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−400%

35−40

+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%