Radeon RX Vega 2 vs Quadro 3000M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 777 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.14 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | Fermi | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $398.96 | no data |
| Current price | $447 (1.1x MSRP) | $351 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX Vega 2 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | no data |
| CUDA | 2.1 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 February 2011 | 7 January 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
