UHD Graphics 620 vs Quadro 2000

Place in performance ranking	799	775
Place by popularity	not in top-100	23
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.40	0.71
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Gen. 9.5 (2017)
GPU code name	GF106	Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 December 2010 (13 years ago)	1 September 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$141 (0.2x MSRP)	$706

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 620 has 78% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	24
Core clock speed	625 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	27.60
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000 and UHD Graphics 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	178 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.103
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000 2.45

UHD Graphics 620 2.67
+9%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000 by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 2000 948

UHD Graphics 620 1030
+8.6%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000 by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −30%	13 +30%
1440p	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
4K	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −14.3%	8 +14.3%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −14.3%	8 +14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Hitman 3	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −20%	36 +20%
Hitman 3	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −13.3%	34 +13.3%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −10%	11 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	1−2
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−33.3%

4−5
+33.3%

This is how Quadro 2000 and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 620 is 30% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 620 is 14% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics 620 is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.45	2.67
Recency	24 December 2010	1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	15 Watt