GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Quadro 2000

Place in the ranking	842	71
Place by popularity	not in top-100	97
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.15	40.97
Power efficiency	2.73	15.18
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF106	TU104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 December 2010 (14 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 27213% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2560
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	215 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	283.2
Floating-point processing power	0.48 TFLOPS	9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	178 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	650 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000 2.43

RTX 2070 Super 46.80
+1826%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 2000 946

RTX 2070 Super 18218
+1826%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 2000 3876

RTX 2070 Super 99314
+2462%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −2133%	134 +2133%
1440p	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
4K	2−3 −2450%	51 +2450%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	99.83 −2581%	3.72 +2581%
1440p	149.75 −2271%	6.32 +2271%
4K	299.50 −2961%	9.78 +2961%

RTX 2070 Super has 2581% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super has 2271% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super has 2961% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	117 +0%	117 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	94 +0%	94 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	98 +0%	98 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	96 +0%	96 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +0%	86 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	252 +0%	252 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	131 +0%	131 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +0%	122 +0%
Valorant	214 +0%	214 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	180 +0%	180 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	84 +0%	84 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	76 +0%	76 +0%
Dota 2	142 +0%	142 +0%
Far Cry 5	92 +0%	92 +0%
Fortnite	168 +0%	168 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	198 +0%	198 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	102 +0%	102 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 +0%	145 +0%
Metro Exodus	89 +0%	89 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	249 +0%	249 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	67 +0%	67 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	128 +0%	128 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85 +0%	85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	78 +0%	78 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +0%	69 +0%
Dota 2	129 +0%	129 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	167 +0%	167 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100 +0%	100 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	143 +0%	143 +0%
Valorant	194 +0%	194 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	95 +0%	95 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	95 +0%	95 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
World of Tanks	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	83 +0%	83 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +0%	45 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	123 +0%	123 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	68 +0%	68 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	138 +0%	138 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Dota 2	93 +0%	93 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	93 +0%	93 +0%
Metro Exodus	37 +0%	37 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	164 +0%	164 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	93 +0%	93 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12 +0%	12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 +0%	22 +0%
Dota 2	128 +0%	128 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Fortnite	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	65 +0%	65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Valorant	73 +0%	73 +0%

This is how Quadro 2000 and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super is 2133% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super is 1875% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super is 2450% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.43	46.80
Recency	24 December 2010	9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	215 Watt

Quadro 2000 has 246.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has a 1825.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.