GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro 2000

Place in performance ranking	799	709
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.40	0.34
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GF106	N11E-GS
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 December 2010 (13 years ago)	3 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$141 (0.2x MSRP)	$88

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 2000 has 18% better value for money than GTX 460M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	192
Core clock speed	625 MHz	675 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	16.1 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops	518.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000 and GeForce GTX 460M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	178 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	no data	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1536 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	60.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 API with Feature Level 12.1
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000 2.45

GTX 460M 3.22
+31.4%

GeForce GTX 460M outperforms Quadro 2000 by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 2000 948

GTX 460M 1246
+31.4%

GeForce GTX 460M outperforms Quadro 2000 by 31% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro 2000 3905

GTX 460M 4098
+4.9%

GeForce GTX 460M outperforms Quadro 2000 by 5% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro 2000 12

GTX 460M 14
+16.7%

GeForce GTX 460M outperforms Quadro 2000 by 17% in Octane Render OctaneBench.