Arc A370M vs Playstation 3 RSX 28nm

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Xe HPG (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRSX-D5305LAlchemist
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed550 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors302 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate13.2099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 gflops
ROPs832
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2013 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 50 Watt

Playstation 3 RSX 28nm has 138.1% lower power consumption.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX 28nm and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 3 RSX 28nm is a desktop card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 28nm
Playstation 3 RSX 28nm
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 28nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.