Quadro T500 Mobile vs P106-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-100 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P106-100
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.15
+90.6%

P106-100 outperforms T500 Mobile by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P106-100 P106-100
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking329492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.8234.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP106TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 June 2017 (7 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280896
Core clock speed1506 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate136.794.92
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs8056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+80.6%
36
−80.6%
1440p27−30
+80%
15
−80%
4K30−35
+76.5%
17
−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how P106-100 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P106-100 is 81% faster in 1080p
  • P106-100 is 80% faster in 1440p
  • P106-100 is 76% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.15 9.00
Recency 19 June 2017 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 18 Watt

P106-100 has a 90.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that P106-100 is a workstation card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P106-100 P106 100
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
P106-100 P106 100
vs
T600 T600
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire HD 7970M Crossfire
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB RTX 3050 4 GB
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
P106-100 P106 100
vs
CMP 170HX 10 GB CMP 170HX 10 GB
P106-100 P106 100
vs
Voodoo5 5500 AGP
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
Instinct MI200 Radeon Instinct MI200
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 209 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P106-100 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.