Quadro RTX 6000 vs P106-090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-090 and Quadro RTX 6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P106-090
2017
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.68

RTX 6000 outperforms P106-090 by a whopping 646% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking639101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.34
Power efficiency5.8712.63
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP106TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 July 2017 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684608
Core clock speed1354 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate73.49509.8
Floating-point processing power2.352 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs48288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache288 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P106-090 5.68
RTX 6000 42.38
+646%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-090 2404
Samples: 12
RTX 6000 17934
+646%
Samples: 237

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

P106-090 21020
RTX 6000 146408
+597%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

P106-090 18525
RTX 6000 129634
+600%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.68 42.38
Recency 31 July 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 260 Watt

P106-090 has 246.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 646.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 62 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 142 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P106-090 or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.