GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018, $599
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.89

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking565191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.80no data
Power efficiency2.4330.80
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32002560
Core clock speed1582 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6184.8
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs200160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache1.2 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache2.5 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 7.89
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 32.06
+306%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 3300
Samples: 4
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13409
+306%
Samples: 372

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−342%
106
+342%
1440p16−18
−356%
73
+356%
4K10−12
−370%
47
+370%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.96no data
1440p37.44no data
4K59.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Fortnite 133
+0%
133
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 136
+0%
136
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Fortnite 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 75
+0%
75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+0%
75
+0%
Valorant 136
+0%
136
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 108
+0%
108
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+0%
73
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 43
+0%
43
+0%

This is how P102-100 and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 342% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 356% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 370% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.89 32.06
Recency 12 February 2018 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has a 306.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
vs
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
RX Vega M AMD Radeon RX Vega M
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 3060 12 GB GA104
RX 6600 LE AMD RX 6600 LE
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
Jetson Nano Jetson Nano
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
Tesla PG503-216 Tesla PG503-216
Tesla V100 DGXS NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS
vs
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
vs
RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
Playstation 5 GPU 5 GPU
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 519 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.