Arc A770M vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with Arc A770M, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018, $599
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.85

A770M outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
Arc A770M Arc A770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.93no data
Power efficiency2.4218.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP102DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32004096
Core clock speed1582 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6524.8
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs80128
TMUs200256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache1.2 MB6 MB
L2 Cache2.5 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB16 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 7.85
Arc A770M 28.19
+259%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 3300
Samples: 4
Arc A770M 11844
+259%
Samples: 151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−290%
82
+290%
1440p14−16
−264%
51
+264%
4K10−12
−260%
36
+260%

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.52no data
1440p42.79no data
4K59.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
+0%
173
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how P102-100 and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 290% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 264% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 260% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.85 28.19
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

Arc A770M has a 259.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
Arc A770M Arc A770M
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
R6 M335DX R6 M335DX
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
RTX A4000 Max-Q RTX A4000 Max-Q
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
RTX 5090 DD RTX 5090 DD
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-2
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Arc 7 A770M 7 A770M
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Instinct MI300 Instinct MI300
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7590M HD 7590M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 GTX 1060 3 GB GP104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 93 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Arc A770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.